Patient-controlled propofol sedation for elderly patients: safety and patient attitude toward control.

نویسندگان

  • I A Herrick
  • A W Gelb
  • B Nichols
  • J Kirkby
چکیده

PURPOSE Little information is available regarding the use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) among elderly patients undergoing operative procedures under local or regional anaesthesia. This prospective, randomized study evaluated the safety of propofol PCS, and the attitude among elderly patients toward self-administration of sedation during cataract surgery. METHODS Prospective, randomized study conducted in a University affiliated, tertiary-care hospital. Fifty-five elderly patients (aged 65-79 yr) were randomized to receive propofol patient-controlled sedation (PCS) (n = 28) or no intraoperative sedation (n = 27) during cataract surgery performed under peribulbar block. The PCS parameters consisted of a lockout interval of three minutes and a PCS dose of 0.3 mg.kg-1. Study groups were compared with respect to sedation, anxiety and discomfort visual analogue scores (VAS), cognitive functioning, patient satisfaction and the incidence of intraoperative complications. RESULTS Patients in the PCS group administered a mean propofol dose of 65 +/- 49 mg during procedures with a mean duration of 46 min. The incidence of intraoperative complications and sedation, anxiety and discomfort VAS were similar between groups. Patient satisfaction with PCS was high. In the PCS group, 10 (35%) of the 28 patients did not use the device because they were comfortable and did not feel they needed sedation. Satisfaction was higher in the PCS group (P = 0.02), whether or not they used the PCS device, compared with patients who did not receive a PCS device. CONCLUSIONS Propofol PCS represents a safe sedation technique among elderly patients in a monitored care setting. Elderly patients appear to prefer the option of receiving some form of intraoperative sedation and respond favourably to the opportunity to control administration.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Sedation with etomidate-fentanyl versus propofol-fentanyl in colonoscopies: A prospective randomized study

Abstract Background: The combination of propofol-fentanyl for sedation during colonoscopy is characterized by the frequent incidence of side effects. Etomidate-fentanyl provides fewer hemodynamic and respiratory complications. The aim of our study was to compare the safety and efficacy of propofol-fentanyl and etomidate-fentanyl for conscious sedation in elective colonoscopy. Methods: This do...

متن کامل

A randomized controlled trial comparing patient-controlled and physician-controlled sedation in the emergency department.

STUDY OBJECTIVE We compare patient-controlled sedation (PCS) and emergency physician-controlled sedation (EPCS) with respect to propofol requirements, depth of sedation, adverse events, recovery time, physician satisfaction, and patient satisfaction in emergency department (ED) patients requiring brief but painful procedures. METHODS One hundred sixty-six patients in this randomized controlle...

متن کامل

The safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy: prospective study.

OBJECTIVE To assess the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of patient-controlled sedation for elective day-case colonoscopy, and the factors predicting patients' unwillingness to use patient-controlled sedation for colonoscopy. DESIGN Prospective, non-randomised study. SETTING University-affiliated endoscopy centre, Hong Kong. PARTICIPANTS Five hundred patients who underwent elective ...

متن کامل

Alfentanil and patient-controlled propofol sedation - facilitate gynaecological outpatient surgery with increased risk of respiratory events.

BACKGROUND Widespread use of patient-controlled sedation (PCS) demands simplicity and a predictable outcome. We evaluated patients' safety and ease of use of PCS for gynaecological outpatient procedures. METHODS In a prospective double-blind study, 165 patients were randomized to use propofol or propofol with alfentanil as PCS combined with local anaesthetic for pain control. Data on cardiopu...

متن کامل

مقــایسه اثر آرام بخشی هوشیــارانه دو داروی پروپوفول و میدازولام در اعمــال آندوسکوپی و کولونوسکوپی

Background: Endoscopic procedures are performed for diagnosis and treatment of GI disturbances and require adequate, short-time anesthesia. Propofol is a rather recently introduced IV drug used for its conscious sedation effects. This study has compared the effects and complications of propofol versus midazolam in endoscopic procedures in Hamedan in 2001. Materials and Methods: This double blin...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie

دوره 43 10  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 1996